There is fierce competition for jobs in conservation, so the
big question is ‘how to make yourself stand out from the crowd?’ The answer is
to put yourself in the shoes of the team tasked with sifting all those
applications. I used to do this job as part of recruiting new staff, and it was incredibly difficult. Imagine that
pile of anything upwards of 500 applicants for a job (there was one in the
1990s where I was told there were over 1,000 applicants! You must be clear why
you have rejected people with very similar degrees, so you also must have a set
of criteria against which to judge applicants. One of my criteria was ‘does the
applicant actually show a real interest in wildlife? And ‘will this person
bring something special into the team?’
As an applicant for jobs, have you ever turned the role
around and then asked – would I stand out from the crowd? If not, how can I
make myself more employable? I guess a MSc might help, but then an awful lot of
people have a MSc. So, maybe a PhD? I am certainly aware of one job where I was
eminently qualified but did not have a PhD and therefore did not make the
shortlist. BUT, a PhD does not necessarily mean that the person will have what
it really takes to work with people or to look at issues from a practical
angle. Equally, there is a danger that a PhD will look at a job in a way that
is too research orientated instead of being something that has to be delivered
within a clear timescale. So, as an employer I would not leap to the conclusion
that a PhD is essential. Where is the evidence of enthusiasm and personal
drive?
Remember too, that although you will start your career in a
non-managerial role, you may want to ascend the greasy pole! Getting suitable
organising experience from an early age is often very helpful. You don’t have
to be in work to get such experience. Participating in the running of a club or
society at Uni is a good start. Then, there comes the post-Uni experience –
clubs and societies are crying out for new, young and dynamic members. Their
ranks may seem ‘crusty’ but that will change if you join, get involved and
encourage other youngsters to join in. Why are those societies lacking young
people? It is a vicious circle – the lack of younger members puts young people
off joining, and so the society gets older still. You could break that mould and,
in the process, put something positive on your CV both for today and for the
future.
There are also skills that are in short supply. My former
employer was stuffed full of birders (and no it was not RSPB), but there were precious
few entomologists beyond those interested in dragonflies and Lepidoptera. Think
about acquiring skills in a less well-frequented discipline. Yes, they are
harder to break into because you need to think about keys, microscopes and
maybe retaining specimens. BUT, in the process, you will acquire taxonomic
skills and will also learn a lot more about ecology. The best ecologists I know
are amongst Coleopterists, Hemipterists and (I would say that) especially
Dipterists!
It will take years to become known as a top-ranking birder –
there are so many also-rans! It will take a lot less time to become known in
the circles of Dipterists, Coleopterists, Hymenopterists and Hemipterists. So,
get involved with those groups. Everybody is getting worried that we don’t have
a vibrant new youth base. We could have if there were new young leaders. Why
not get involved with one (or more) of the Recording Schemes. Scheme organisers
are on the lookout for bright young replacements – eventually we will retire
and there will be vacancies for new ‘names’. It could be you, but you do need
to put in the effort.
Remember too, that most societies have newsletters and
journals that like short notes. Such notes and observations all count as ‘publications’
and although not top-stream peer-review, they do help you hone your writing
skills and experience of ‘peer-review’ which may stand you in good stead should
you think about a PhD. I’ve been hugely frustrated to see some really nice MSc
projects that have never been written up but would have formed a very nice
paper in the journals of one of the major non-vocational societies such as the
British Journal of Entomology & Natural History and Dipterists Digest.
Does this resonate with you? If so, the world is your
oyster. You don’t have to go abroad to develop the experience that can set you
apart from the crowd; and you don’t have to wait. The sooner you get started
the sooner you will be developing a name and reputation.
I don’t think I had a particularly outstanding career, but I
have gained immensely from my engagement in the non-vocational world. As a
16-year old I joined the Committee of Mitcham Camera Club. By 25 I was on Cons
Committee at Surrey Wildlife Trust and by 33 I was scheme organiser for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme. I’ve done a lot more besides and have gained hugely
from the experience both professionally and socially. You could do the same or
a lot better!
I've had several conversations with our local young river technicians where we've talked about their careers as ecologists. What they would say is that they thought they would be practicing *ecology*, which is what they learnt at uni. What they find themselves actually doing is negotiating with farmers and trying to do the best with the political policies they are lumbered with. Their big complaint was that they had to learn networking and people skills really fast and on the ground. This was not covered at all in their course and they felt they had entered the workforce very green and naive. I should point out that I live in central France. Whether or not their employers would have recognised networking and people skills as part of the job requirements is also questionable, so even if they had been able to demonstrate it on their CVs it might have just been seen as a distraction.
ReplyDeleteThat tends to reinforce the points I make - you don't get people skills from courses you get them by engaging and working with others - committes develop negotiating and influencing skills; leading meetings develops wider people skills. My point is not that they will be that much better equipped to do a job but they will stand out and have a greater chance of getting a job in the first place.
ReplyDelete